1990 • Audi
200
Audi 200 2.4 (136 Hp) 1990Overall Score60.5/100
1990 Audi 200 vs 1990 Toyota Estima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Toyota
Estima
Toyota Estima 2.4 i (132 Hp) 1990Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Estima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Estima
AudiMakeToyota
200ModelEstima
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Estima
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2438 cc
136 HPPower132 HP
0 NmTorque204 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Estima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption14,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Estima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/60 R15Tyre size215 / 65 R15
Dimensions
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Estima
4807 mmLength4750 mm
1814 mmWidth1800 mm
1422 mmHeight1780 mm
1290 KgWeight1730 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2860 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 200 and 1990 Toyota Estima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Estima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…