1999 • Toyota
Crown
Toyota Crown 2.5 i (180 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
1999 Toyota Crown vs 2000 Rover 75 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.5 V6 (177 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CrownSpecificationRover 75
ToyotaMakeRover
CrownModel75
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota CrownSpecificationRover 75
—0–100 km/h8,5 s
0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2491 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
235 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CrownSpecificationRover 75
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CrownSpecificationRover 75
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/75 SR14Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CrownSpecificationRover 75
4690 mmLength4747 mm
1695 mmWidth1778 mm
1515 mmHeight1424 mm
1500 KgWeight1445 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2746 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Toyota Crown and 2000 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…