DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 75 vs 1999 Toyota Crown Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeToyota
75ModelCrown
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
240 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears—
205/65 R15Tyre size185/75 SR14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4747 mmLength4690 mm
1778 mmWidth1695 mm
1424 mmHeight1515 mm
1445 KgWeight1500 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 75 and 1999 Toyota Crown approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…