DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Crown vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeOpel
CrownModelOmega
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed229 km/h
2491 ccEngine displacement2597 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
235 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption14,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,3 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/75 SR14Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4898 mm
1695 mmWidth1776 mm
1515 mmHeight1455 mm
1500 KgWeight1610 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Crown and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…