DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Toyota Cresta vs 1990 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Cresta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAudi
CrestaModel90
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2491 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
180 HPPower133 HP
235 NmTorque186 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4403 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1397 mm
—Weight1280 Kg
—Wheelbase2537 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Toyota Cresta and 1990 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…