1990 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.3 E (133 Hp) 1990Overall Score63.5/100
1990 Audi 90 vs 1990 Toyota Cresta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Toyota
Cresta
Toyota Cresta 2.5 i (180 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Cresta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationToyota Cresta
AudiMakeToyota
90ModelCresta
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationToyota Cresta
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
133 HPPower180 HP
186 NmTorque235 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationToyota Cresta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationToyota Cresta
4403 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1397 mmHeight—
1280 KgWeight—
2537 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 90 and 1990 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…