DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Cresta vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSeat
CrestaModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption14 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4617 mm
1755 mmWidth1810 mm
1420 mmHeight1728 mm
—Weight1754 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Cresta and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…