DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeToyota
AlhambraModelCresta
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
210 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
14 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4617 mmLength4750 mm
1810 mmWidth1755 mm
1728 mmHeight1420 mm
1754 KgWeight—
2835 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…