DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Corolla vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
CorollaModel3
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
143 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4385 mmLength4420 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1475 mmHeight1465 mm
1090 KgWeight1275 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Corolla and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…