2003 • BMW
M5
BMW M5 4.9 (400 Hp) 2003Overall Score87.5/100
2003 BMW M5 vs 2003 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R (390 Hp) 2003Overall Score88.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
87.5–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW M5SpecificationFord Mustang
BMWMakeFord
M5ModelMustang
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
BMW M5SpecificationFord Mustang
5,3 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed280 km/h
4941 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
400 HPPower390 HP
500 NmTorque529 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
BMW M5SpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank59 lt
21,1 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
13,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW M5SpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R18; 275/35 R18Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW M5SpecificationFord Mustang
4784 mmLength4661 mm
1800 mmWidth1857 mm
1437 mmHeight1344 mm
1795 KgWeight1745 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2573 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 BMW M5 and 2003 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…