DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mustang vs 2003 BMW M5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW M5
FordMakeBMW
MustangModelM5
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW M5
—0–100 km/h5,3 s
280 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4941 cc
390 HPPower400 HP
529 NmTorque500 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW M5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption21,1 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption13,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW M5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R17Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW M5
4661 mmLength4784 mm
1857 mmWidth1800 mm
1344 mmHeight1437 mm
1745 KgWeight1795 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mustang and 2003 BMW M5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…