DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 BMW M3 vs 1996 Wiesmann Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Wiesmann Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.5–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeWiesmann
M3ModelRoadster
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeRoadster
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

5,6 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed255 km/h
3201 ccEngine displacement3201 cc
321 HPPower321 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
17,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,1 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17; 245/40 R17Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength3860 mm
1710 mmWidth1750 mm
1340 mmHeight1160 mm
1560 KgWeight1060 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 BMW M3 and 1996 Wiesmann Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Wiesmann Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…