E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW M3 vs 1996 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW M3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.5–83.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
BMWMakeBMW
M3ModelM3
2000Model year1996
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
5,2 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3246 ccEngine displacement3201 cc
343 HPPower321 HP
365 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank62 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption17,0 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18; 255/40 R18Tyre size225/45 R17; 245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
4492 mmLength4433 mm
1780 mmWidth1710 mm
1372 mmHeight1340 mm
1495 KgWeight1560 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW M3 and 1996 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW M3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2000 Wiesmann RoadsterVS2000 BMW M3Wiesmann Roadster vs BMW M32000 and 2000 model years1999 BMW Z3VS2000 BMW M3BMW Z3 vs BMW M31999 and 2000 model years1999 BMW M3VS2000 BMW M3BMW M3 vs BMW M31999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVS2000 BMW M3TVR Tuscan vs BMW M32002 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVS2000 BMW M3Acura NSX vs BMW M32002 and 2000 model years

Comments are loading…