2011 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.6 V6 (245 Hp) 2011Overall Score73.75/100
2011 Holden UTE vs 2011 Toyota Blade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationToyota Blade
HoldenMakeToyota
UTEModelBlade
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationToyota Blade
—0–100 km/h6,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
245 HPPower280 HP
330 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Holden UTESpecificationToyota Blade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationToyota Blade
5055 mmLength4220 mm
1899 mmWidth1760 mm
1497 mmHeight1515 mm
1697 KgWeight1250 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Holden UTE and 2011 Toyota Blade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableDodge Nitro vs Holden UTE2011 and 2011 model yearsVSImage unavailableToyota Blade vs Holden UTE2011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Discovery vs Holden UTE2011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableBuick Lucerne vs Holden UTE2011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Highlander vs Holden UTE2015 and 2011 model yearsComments are loading…