2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.25/100
2011 Toyota Blade vs 2011 RAM 1500 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • RAM
1500
RAM 1500 3.7 V6 (215 Hp) 2011Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BladeSpecificationRAM 1500
ToyotaMakeRAM
BladeModel1500
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5-6
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota BladeSpecificationRAM 1500
6,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
280 HPPower215 HP
206 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota BladeSpecificationRAM 1500
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption14,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota BladeSpecificationRAM 1500
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota BladeSpecificationRAM 1500
4220 mmLength5816 mm
1760 mmWidth—
1515 mmHeight1906 mm
1250 KgWeight2232 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase3569 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Toyota Blade and 2011 RAM 1500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…