2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.25/100
2011 Toyota Blade vs 2011 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.6 V6 (245 Hp) 2011Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden UTE
ToyotaMakeHolden
BladeModelUTE
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden UTE
6,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
280 HPPower245 HP
206 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden UTE
4220 mmLength5055 mm
1760 mmWidth1899 mm
1515 mmHeight1497 mm
1250 KgWeight1697 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase3009 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Toyota Blade and 2011 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…