2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.25/100
2011 Toyota Blade vs 2012 GMC Canyon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • GMC
Canyon
GMC Canyon 3.7 (242 Hp) 2012Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BladeSpecificationGMC Canyon
ToyotaMakeGMC
BladeModelCanyon
2011Model year2012
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5/6
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota BladeSpecificationGMC Canyon
6,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3654 cc
280 HPPower242 HP
206 NmTorque328 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota BladeSpecificationGMC Canyon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota BladeSpecificationGMC Canyon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4 Hydra-Matic
—Tyre size225/70 R15; 235/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota BladeSpecificationGMC Canyon
4220 mmLength5260 mm
1760 mmWidth1742 mm
1515 mmHeight1723 mm
1250 KgWeight1886 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Toyota Blade and 2012 GMC Canyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…