DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 BMW M3 vs 1991 Mazda Sentia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Sentia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M3SpecificationMazda Sentia
BMWMakeMazda
M3ModelSentia
1990Model year1991
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW M3SpecificationMazda Sentia
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
248 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2467 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
238 HPPower200 HP
240 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M3SpecificationMazda Sentia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M3SpecificationMazda Sentia
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/45 ZR16Tyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M3SpecificationMazda Sentia
4345 mmLength4920 mm
1680 mmWidth1795 mm
1370 mmHeight1395 mm
1200 KgWeight1640 Kg
2565 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 BMW M3 and 1991 Mazda Sentia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…