DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Mazda Sentia vs 1990 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Sentia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda SentiaSpecificationBMW M3
MazdaMakeBMW
SentiaModelM3
1991Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Mazda SentiaSpecificationBMW M3
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
220 km/hTop speed248 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2467 cc
200 HPPower238 HP
260 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda SentiaSpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda SentiaSpecificationBMW M3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size225/45 ZR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda SentiaSpecificationBMW M3
4920 mmLength4345 mm
1795 mmWidth1680 mm
1395 mmHeight1370 mm
1640 KgWeight1200 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2565 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Mazda Sentia and 1990 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…