DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Toyota Alphard vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
AlphardModelFlex
2017Model year2014
MinivanBody typeSUV
7Seats6-7
5Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
300 HPPower364 HP
361 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank71 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears6
225/60 R17; 235/50 R18Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4945 mmLength5130 mm
1850 mmWidth1930 mm
1945 mmHeight1727 mm
2125 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Toyota Alphard and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…