2014 • Ford
Flex
Ford Flex 3.5 V6 (364 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
2014 Ford Flex vs 2017 Toyota Alphard Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Toyota
Alphard
Toyota Alphard 3.5 V6 (300 Hp) 2017Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Ford Flex
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FlexSpecificationToyota Alphard
FordMakeToyota
FlexModelAlphard
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typeMinivan
6-7Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Ford FlexSpecificationToyota Alphard
—0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
364 HPPower300 HP
475 NmTorque361 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FlexSpecificationToyota Alphard
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,3 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FlexSpecificationToyota Alphard
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8
235/60 R17Tyre size225/60 R17; 235/50 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FlexSpecificationToyota Alphard
5130 mmLength4945 mm
1930 mmWidth1850 mm
1727 mmHeight1945 mm
—Weight2125 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Ford Flex and 2017 Toyota Alphard approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…