2010 • Toyota
Alphard
Toyota Alphard 2.8 (170 Hp) 2010Overall Score51.25/100
2010 Toyota Alphard vs 2006 Suzuki Forenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Suzuki
Forenza
Suzuki Forenza 2.0 (120 Hp) 2006Overall Score52/100
WINNER
Suzuki Forenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.25–52
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota AlphardSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
ToyotaMakeSuzuki
AlphardModelForenza
2010Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota AlphardSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
170 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota AlphardSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota AlphardSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota AlphardSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
4850 mmLength4500 mm
1830 mmWidth1725 mm
1890 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1250 Kg
2950 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Toyota Alphard and 2006 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…