DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Suzuki Forenza vs 2010 Toyota Alphard Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Forenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeToyota
ForenzaModelAlphard
2006Model year2010
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
120 HPPower170 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4850 mm
1725 mmWidth1830 mm
1445 mmHeight1890 mm
1250 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase2950 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Suzuki Forenza and 2010 Toyota Alphard approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…