2005 • Toyota
Alphard
Toyota Alphard 2.4 i (159Hp) 2005Overall Score63.25/100
2005 Toyota Alphard vs 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.4 4x4 (132 Hp) 2005Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Alphard
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota AlphardSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
AlphardModelL 200
2005Model year2005
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota AlphardSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
159 HPPower132 HP
220 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota AlphardSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota AlphardSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size205/80 R16
Dimensions
Toyota AlphardSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4865 mmLength4500 mm
1830 mmWidth1655 mm
1935 mmHeight1570 mm
—Weight1660 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Toyota Alphard and 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Alphard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…