DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2005 Toyota Alphard Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Alphard

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
L 200ModelAlphard
2005Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
4Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
142 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2362 cc
132 HPPower159 HP
192 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size225/55 R17

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4865 mm
1655 mmWidth1830 mm
1570 mmHeight1935 mm
1660 KgWeight—
2230 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2005 Toyota Alphard approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Alphard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…