DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota 4runner vs 2005 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
4runnerModel4runner
2004Model year2005
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3955 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
245 HPPower236 HP
382 NmTorque361 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank87 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4805 mm
1875 mmWidth1910 mm
1750 mmHeight1760-1805 mm
1941 KgWeight1950 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota 4runner and 2005 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…