DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Toyota 4runner vs 2004 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
4runnerModel4runner
2005Model year2004
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3955 cc
236 HPPower245 HP
361 NmTorque382 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank87 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4800 mm
1910 mmWidth1875 mm
1760-1805 mmHeight1750 mm
1950 KgWeight1941 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Toyota 4runner and 2004 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…