DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Toyota 4runner vs 2009 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLand Rover
4runnerModelDiscovery
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3999 cc
236 HPPower216 HP
361 NmTorque360 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank86 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption15,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4829 mm
1910 mmWidth—
1760-1805 mmHeight1887 mm
1950 KgWeight—
2790 mmWheelbase2885 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Toyota 4runner and 2009 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…