DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Toyota Blade vs 2009 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Blade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
BladeModel4runner
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
280 HPPower236 HP
206 NmTorque361 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank87 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4805 mm
1760 mmWidth1910 mm
1515 mmHeight1760-1805 mm
1250 KgWeight1950 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Toyota Blade and 2009 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…