DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Toyota 4runner vs 2008 Toyota Blade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Blade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
4runnerModelBlade
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
236 HPPower280 HP
361 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4220 mm
1910 mmWidth1760 mm
1760-1805 mmHeight1515 mm
1950 KgWeight1250 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Toyota 4runner and 2008 Toyota Blade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…