DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Land Rover Discovery vs 2008 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
DiscoveryModel4runner
2009Model year2008
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3999 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
216 HPPower236 HP
360 NmTorque361 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
86 ltFuel tank87 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt
15,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4829 mmLength4805 mm
—Width1910 mm
1887 mmHeight1760-1805 mm
—Weight1950 Kg
2885 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Land Rover Discovery and 2008 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…