DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Toyota 4runner vs 1996 Volvo S70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
4runnerModelS70
1996Model year1996
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
165 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
150 HPPower144 HP
240 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4539 mmLength4720 mm
1689 mmWidth1760 mm
1689-1745 mmHeight1400 mm
1515 KgWeight1430 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Toyota 4runner and 1996 Volvo S70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…