DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan Altima vs 1996 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeToyota
AltimaModel4runner
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2388 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
216 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R16Tyre size225/75 R15; 265/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4539 mm
1704 mmWidth1689 mm
1420 mmHeight1689-1745 mm
1294 KgWeight1515 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan Altima and 1996 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…