DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Toyota 4runner vs 1989 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAudi
4runnerModel90
1989Model year1989
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2366 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
116 HPPower133 HP
190 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
225/75 R15Tyre size165/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4478 mm
1689 mmWidth1695 mm
1679 mmHeight1397 mm
—Weight1365 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Toyota 4runner and 1989 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…