DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi 100 vs 1989 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
100Model4runner
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2366 cc
136 HPPower116 HP
189 NmTorque190 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
3Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size225/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4793 mmLength4435 mm
1814 mmWidth1689 mm
1422 mmHeight1679 mm
1250 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi 100 and 1989 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…