DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Tofas Tipo vs 2000 Peugeot 106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 106

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakePeugeot
TipoModel106
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

13,1 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
170 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1372 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
76 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque111 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3958 mmLength3678 mm
1700 mmWidth1594 mm
1445 mmHeight1376 mm
990 KgWeight815 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Tofas Tipo and 2000 Peugeot 106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…