DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 106 vs 1999 Tofas Tipo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 106

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeTofas
106ModelTipo
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

13,2 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
178 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
75 HPPower76 HP
111 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3678 mmLength3958 mm
1594 mmWidth1700 mm
1376 mmHeight1445 mm
815 KgWeight990 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 106 and 1999 Tofas Tipo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…