DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Tofas Tempra vs 1996 Audi Cabriolet Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeAudi
TempraModelCabriolet
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
210 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
148 HPPower115 HP
186 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4354 mmLength4366 mm
1695 mmWidth1716 mm
1445 mmHeight1379 mm
1195 KgWeight1350 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2556 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Tofas Tempra and 1996 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…