1996 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.25/100
1996 Audi Cabriolet vs 1996 Tofas Tempra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Tofas
Tempra
Tofas Tempra 2.0 i 16V (148 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Tofas Tempra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CabrioletSpecificationTofas Tempra
AudiMakeTofas
CabrioletModelTempra
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Audi CabrioletSpecificationTofas Tempra
12,9 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
187 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
115 HPPower148 HP
165 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CabrioletSpecificationTofas Tempra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,7 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CabrioletSpecificationTofas Tempra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R14V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi CabrioletSpecificationTofas Tempra
4366 mmLength4354 mm
1716 mmWidth1695 mm
1379 mmHeight1445 mm
1350 KgWeight1195 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Audi Cabriolet and 1996 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…