DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Tofas Tempra vs 1996 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeHonda
TempraModelAccord
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
210 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2155 cc
148 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque198 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14VTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4354 mmLength4770 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1445 mmHeight1425 mm
1195 KgWeight1385 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Tofas Tempra and 1996 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…