DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Tofas Tempra vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeGeo
TempraModelStorm
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
119 HPPower130 HP
162 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4150 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1300 mm
1150 KgWeight1010 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Tofas Tempra and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…