DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Tofas Tempra vs 1999 Fiat Siena Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeFiat
TempraModelSiena
2000Model year1999
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
177 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
86 HPPower87 HP
130 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4472 mmLength4100 mm
1695 mmWidth1626 mm
1500 mmHeight1445 mm
1035 KgWeight1035 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Tofas Tempra and 1999 Fiat Siena approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…