DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 FAW Jetta vs 2000 Tofas Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeTofas
JettaModelTempra
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
180 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
87 HPPower86 HP
135 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4385 mmLength4472 mm
1674 mmWidth1695 mm
1415 mmHeight1500 mm
1060 KgWeight1035 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 FAW Jetta and 2000 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…