DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Tofas Tempra vs 2000 Tofas Dogan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Dogan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeTofas
TempraModelDogan
1997Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
86 HPPower96 HP
130 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size185/65 R14 H
YesABS—

Dimensions

4472 mmLength4316 mm
1695 mmWidth1642 mm
1500 mmHeight1437 mm
1035 KgWeight1040 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Tofas Tempra and 2000 Tofas Dogan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Dogan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…