DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1997 Tofas Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeTofas
Space RunnerModelTempra
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
155 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
82 HPPower86 HP
172 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4472 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1665 mmHeight1500 mm
1260 KgWeight1035 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1997 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…