DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Tata Sumo vs 2011 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda BT-50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TataMakeMazda
SumoModelBT-50
2012Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
7/9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2956 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
85 HPPower143 HP
250 NmTorque330 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,0 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4258 mmLength5075 mm
1700 mmWidth1805 mm
1925 mmHeight1750 mm
—Weight1940 Kg
2425 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Tata Sumo and 2011 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda BT-50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…