2002 • Tata
Safari
Tata Safari 1.9 TD (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score40.5/100
2002 Tata Safari vs 2002 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DI 16V (65 Hp) 2002Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Tata Safari
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata SafariSpecificationOpel Combo
TataMakeOpel
SafariModelCombo
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Tata SafariSpecificationOpel Combo
26,0 s0–100 km/h18,5 s
140 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
90 HPPower65 HP
186 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Tata SafariSpecificationOpel Combo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank52 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tata SafariSpecificationOpel Combo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Tata SafariSpecificationOpel Combo
4650 mmLength4320 mm
1810 mmWidth1685 mm
1920 mmHeight1800 mm
2040 KgWeight1260 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2715 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Tata Safari and 2002 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Safari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…