2002 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DI 16V (65 Hp) 2002Overall Score39.5/100
2002 Opel Combo vs 2002 Tata Safari Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Tata
Safari
Tata Safari 1.9 TD (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score40.5/100
WINNER
Tata Safari
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationTata Safari
OpelMakeTata
ComboModelSafari
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationTata Safari
18,5 s0–100 km/h26,0 s
147 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
65 HPPower90 HP
130 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationTata Safari
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationTata Safari
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationTata Safari
4320 mmLength4650 mm
1685 mmWidth1810 mm
1800 mmHeight1920 mm
1260 KgWeight2040 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2650 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Combo and 2002 Tata Safari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Safari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…