DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Tata Nano vs 2013 Suzuki Alto Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TataMakeSuzuki
NanoModelAlto
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
105 km/hTop speed150 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement996 cc
38 HPPower68 HP
51 NmTorque90 Nm
2Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / CNGFuel typePetrol
15 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption6,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
2,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size155/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3099 mmLength3500 mm
1495 mmWidth1600 mm
1652 mmHeight1470 mm
735-745 KgWeight910 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Tata Nano and 2013 Suzuki Alto approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…