DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Skoda Citigo vs 2013 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeTata
CitigoModelNano
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
160 km/hTop speed105 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement624 cc
60 HPPower38 HP
95 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
35 ltFuel tank15 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption2,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R14Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3563 mmLength3099 mm
1641 mmWidth1495 mm
1478 mmHeight1652 mm
932 KgWeight735-745 Kg
2420 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Skoda Citigo and 2013 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…